Monday, November 28, 2005

Students Ace State Tests, but Earn D's From U.S.

Sam Dillon:

After Tennessee tested its eighth-grade students in math this year, state officials at a jubilant news conference called the results a "cause for celebration." Eighty-seven percent of students performed at or above the proficiency level.

But when the federal government made public the findings of its own tests last month, the results were startlingly different: only 21 percent of Tennessee's eighth graders were considered proficient in math.

Such discrepancies have intensified the national debate over testing and accountability, with some educators saying that numerous states have created easy exams to avoid the sanctions that President Bush's centerpiece education law, No Child Left Behind, imposes on consistently low-scoring schools.

A comparison of state test results against the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress, a federal test mandated by the No Child Left Behind law, shows that wide discrepancies between the state and federal findings were commonplace.

In Mississippi, 89 percent of fourth graders performed at or above proficiency on state reading tests, while only 18 percent of fourth graders demonstrated proficiency on the federal test. Oklahoma, North Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, Alaska, Texas and more than a dozen other states all showed students doing far better on their own reading and math tests than on the federal one.

The chasm is significant because of the compromises behind the No Child Left Behind law. The law requires states to participate in the National Assessment - known to educators as NAEP (pronounced nape) - the most important federal measure of student proficiency.

But in a bow to states' rights, states are allowed to use their own tests in meeting the law's central mandate - that schools increase the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency each year. The law requires 100 percent of the nation's students to reach proficiency - as each state defines it - by 2014.

States set the stringency of their own tests as well as the number of questions students must answer correctly to be labeled proficient. And because states that fail to raise scores over time face serious sanctions, there is little incentive to make the exams difficult, some educators say.

"Under No Child Left Behind, the states get to set the proficiency bar wherever they like, and unfortunately most are setting it quite low," said Michael J. Petrilli, a vice president of the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, which generally supports the federal law.

"They're telling the public in their states that huge numbers of students are proficient, but the NAEP results show that's not the case," Mr. Petrilli said.

Hat tip, Steve Sailer!

No Child Left Behind: A Failure?

Good Schools Rated Poorly By No Child Left Behind Regulations

The Inequality Taboo

The Zorro of Statisticians

The Freakonomics of Race and IQ

Hispanic And Black High School Graduation Rates Very Low

Of Quixotic Crusades and NCLB

2 Comments:

At 9:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How would you like to be a teacher and therefore held accountable for your students performance on these tests? Many of them are probably borderline unteachable. What a nightmare.

 
At 3:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Related links:

'Scared' white teachers fail black students

Black boys betrayed by racist school system, says report

Why African-American boys often fail in school

Basically the articles blame white teachers for the poor grades of blacks.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home


View My Stats