Monday, July 10, 2006

Islamic terrorism in Britain

Michael Portillo:

After the terrorist outrages of July 7, 2005, most Londoners have continued to travel by bus, train and Underground. They are more vigilant, but few seem to experience anxiety about a repeat attack during their journey. That is remarkable because objectively the chances of another massacre must be higher than a year ago.

Last year the bombs were the first shock. The second was to discover that the terrorists were suicide bombers and British. We could have coped with the outrage more easily had the murderers been foreigners, raised in squalor, brainwashed under a theocratic dictatorship and shipped here to massacre people for whom they had no kindred feelings.

It is more plausible that we could defend the country against an exterior threat than defeat one that comes from within. We can hope to monitor comings and goings at our airports and to keep tabs on people who stand out because they are visitors. But the task is almost hopeless if the perpetrators live among us. If four young men who had enjoyed the advantages of life in Britain decide to kill themselves and as many others as possible, then why should there not be 400 or 4,000 more?

Once we understand that, we feel less safe. Also, things have got worse over the past year. Although there has been no anti-Islamic backlash it seems that many British Muslims feel victimised by the authorities’ response to terror. They think they face discrimination when stopped and searched. The bungled police operation in Forest Gate has become an emblem of supposed repression.

Even peace-loving Muslim spokesmen feel obliged to give credence to the perception that their community is being unfairly harassed. It causes some young Muslim men to withdraw further from a British society claimed to be hostile. At best that surrounds the terrorists with a penumbra of disaffected Muslims who may not condemn their crimes or denounce their murderous plots. At worst it enlarges the pool from which new bombers can be recruited.

It is there that Al-Qaeda has scored its greatest success. More significant for the long term than the bombs is the impact that terror has in dividing the groups that make up our society, and in increasing the appeal of militancy to those who can be duped into seeing themselves as repressed.

Muslim complaints about being victimised are perversely directed. Muslims are victims of the bombers, not of the state or the police. It is the terrorists who make Muslims potential objects of suspicion and fear because the bombers murder in the name of Islam. Muslims have every right to be outraged, but their fury should focus on the men of violence. The police action in Forest Gate was cack-handed and the shooting of one of the “suspects” was indefensible. But given the profile of the terrorists, Muslims are bound to be more affected. By analogy, when police are looking for a rapist they interview males without anyone believing them to be institutional men haters.

There are those who in the interests of community relations denounce linking the word Islamic to “violence” or “extremism”. They object that we did not call the IRA “Catholic terrorists”, nor do we speak of “Christian extremism” or link Christian fundamentalism to violence.

There are good reasons for that. Although the IRA is rooted in the Catholic community, its aims are political and secular. Although there certainly are Christian extremists today, just now they are not murdering people in the name of purifying the world. By contrast, across the globe human beings are being slaughtered in large numbers by Muslims quoting from the Koran and vowing death to infidels, including other Muslim sects. Their objectives are political and religious.

So to try to condemn the expression “Islamic violence” is a dangerous attempt at censorship that would hamper our understanding of the threat we face. The term is certainly offensive to Muslims, but the offence is caused by the bombers, not by those who describe the process.

July 7 ringleader linked to Tel Aviv suicide bombers

Joking Muslim cleric mocks victims of London blasts

UK Muslim leaders say anger at Iraq war undimmed

4 Comments:

At 7:29 AM, Anonymous ROB said...

it quite surprising to see people explain why christian-jewish-hindu-buddhist and atheist terror does not exist and its only islamic terror that exists.

we know the media has a certain agenda to follow but i would have thought it was simple enough to explain what terror is, i shall attempt to clarify this for you, if i came to your house kicked in the front door started beating you up and if your family intervened and i shot them up, who do you think the terrorist is, you for defending your home and family or me for attacking you in your own home and killing members of your family.

if these so called islamic terroists are so bad that they want to kill every non beleiver then why is it they are not attacking countries who have not attacked or aided attacks on muslim countries.

any one who attacks without being attacked in the first place without any provocation or verbal threats is a terrorist period, be he christian-muslim-jewish-hindu-buddhist or atheist.

 
At 1:07 PM, Anonymous Ahrimahn said...

any one who attacks without being attacked in the first place without any provocation or verbal threats is a terrorist period, be he christian-muslim-jewish-hindu-buddhist or atheist

Muslim terrorists kill in the name of Allah. Terrorists generally don't kill in the name of Jesus, Yahweh, Buddha or Krishna.

 
At 6:44 AM, Anonymous ROB said...

arimahn the muslims fighting in palestine-iraq-aghanistan-chechnya and kashmir are fighting for liberation from foreign occupation to free their homelands, in your reckoning how are they fighting for allah.

christians when they bombed iraq they wrote on the bombs pray to allah if he does not listen try jesus.

jews in palestine ethnically cleanse palestinians and murder them if the resist because according to them their god told them to take the land of the palestinians.

hindus go around massacring muslims on the pretext they built a mosque over our gods birth place and they kill and eat our gai mata.

 
At 2:22 PM, Anonymous Ahrimahn said...

christians when they bombed iraq they wrote on the bombs pray to allah if he does not listen try jesus

Where did you get this piece of information?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


View My Stats