Jews are still pro-immigration
James D. Besser:
A Jewish community divided on a range of other issues is mostly united behind the need for comprehensive immigration reform and regards the House bill as a good first step.
“Once you get past the Israel issue, it’s near the top of the list of priorities for a lot of groups,” said Haddar Susskind, Washington representative for the Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA).
“It’s one issue where there’s mostly agreement between progressive grass-roots groups and the big national organizations,” said Mik Moore, director of policy for the Jewish Funds for Justice. “There is a real sense of common cause.”
Recently the JFJ sponsored a trip to the Arizona-Mexico border for ten rabbis as a way of putting a human face on the immigration issue.Participants came away “with more of a sense that this is a fundamental, core issue that they needed to bring back to their congregations and share with them,” Moore said.
“Jewish leaders fear immigration bill, a top communal priority, now longshot.”
posted by Adam Lawson @ 1:29 PM
1 comments
1 Comments:
Awesome find MT. I love these hard quotes. Soon as I have a spare minute I'll add them to this scribble of mine that really needs this kind of hard linkage between Jews and immigration:
The Racism and Anti-Semitism Word Games
By Steven Palese
When whites engage in favoritism toward other whites (and therefore discrimination against non-whites), it's called racism. When other groups engage in favoritism, it's called ethnic solidarity. When whites object to Jewish favoritism, it's called anti-semitism. When you buy into these word games, it's called being a useful idiot.
THE DUAL PERSECUTION STRATEGY
When Michael Eisner was appointed CEO of Disney, one of the five mega-media conglomerates (Disney has many media assets besides Mickey Mouse, such as ABC), within months he purged most whites from upper management and replaced them with fellow Jews. Had any victim objected to such Jewish favoritism, they would have been subject to neo-McCarthyite persecution for "anti-semitism". These persecutions are led by Jewish organizations (such as the ADL) and consist of blacklists, coordinated intimidation and economic strangulation of dissidents. See the Walt-Mearsheimer report on the Israel Lobby for details regarding Neo-McCarthyite persecution methodology.
Michael Medved boasted: "The famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-semitic attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions."
("Jews Run Hollywood. So What?," Moment magazine, August 1996.)
The policy: Whites objecting to Jewish favoritism face neo-McCarthyite persecution for "anti-semitism".
Reverse the scenario. Suppose whites took over Disney, purged most Jews from upper management and replaced them with fellow whites. Would such an attempt by whites to compete on equal terms be tolerated?
When Michael Regan, an Assistant District Attorney expressed concern for white group interests, the mildest form of pro-white favoritism, he was immediately subject to neo-McCarthyite persecution for "racism". As with "anti-semitism" witch hunts, these are led by Jewish organizations and involve neo-McCarthyite persecution methodology.
"Regan's fate was sealed when the Washington Post published his observation, from an interview at the conference, that “you can see European Christian Americans are an endangered species.” Though there was nothing explicitly “anti-Semitic” in Regan’s comment, the Anti-Defamation League, America’s most feared and effective thought police, promptly attacked his reputation and his livelihood. In a letter to Regan’s superior, the ADL’s regional director for New York decreed: “Those kinds of comments are absolutely inappropriate for a public official to make,” and Regan was promptly out of a job."
(http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol6no1/61-EditorsNote.pdf )
The policy: Whites engaging in favoritism face neo-McCarthyite persecution for "racism".
This policy of persecuting whites who object to favoritism by others and persecuting whites who engage in it themselves is called the Dual Persecution Strategy. The "favoritism for them, persecution for us" double standard creates a systemic competitive imbalance designed to prevent whites from competing on equal terms.
ETHNIC CLOSED SHOPS
An uneven playing field makes it easy for ethnic closed shops to squeeze whites out of any field. The long term consequence is what we see happening in the vital organs of society, such as media:
"Four of the largest five entertainment giants are now run or owned by Jews. Murdoch's News Corp (at number four) is the only gentile holdout -- however Rupert is as pro-Israel as any Jew, probably more so."
(Los Angeles Jewish Times, 'Yes, Virginia, Jews Do Control the Media,' Oct. 29-Nov. 11, 1999 p. 14)
"Time-Warner, Disney, Viacom-CBS, News Corporation and Universal rule the entertainment world in a way that the old Hollywood studio chiefs only dreamed of. And, after all the deals and buyouts, four of the five are run by Jews. We're back to where we started, bigger than ever."
(Jewish Week, 9-17-99, 12)
"The greatest concentration of Jews, however, is at the producer level -- and it is the producers who decide which stories will go on the air, and how long, and in what order, they will run. In 1982, before a shift in assignments, the executive producers of all three evening newscasts were Jews, as were the executive producers of CBS's 60 Minutes and ABC's 20/20. And Jews are almost equally prominent at the 'senior producer' and 'broadcast producer' levels as well as in senior management. When Reuven Frank stepped down as president of NBC News in 1984, for example, he was replaced by Laurence Grossman, who left the presidency of PBS to take the position."
(Charles Silberman, A Certain People. American Jews and Their Lives Today, Summit Books, 1985, p. 154)
If you buy into "racism" or "anti-semitism" word games, you're consenting to the Dual Persecution Strategy. In doing so, you're supporting an uneven playing field designed to dispossess whites and empower Jews and therefore, by extension, empower the Jewish lobby's agenda. This includes advancing Zionism (Middle East wars), racial engineering (immigration, diversity and multiculturalism) and censorship (political correctness and "hate" speech laws). This agenda is set by an interlocking network of over 300 national Jewish organizations and 4000 foundations with a combined annual budget of $6 billion. (http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html ).
INTIMIDATION OF POLITICIANS AND MEDIA
The political process is also affected. James Abourezk, former US Senator from South Dakota, clearly describes how the "anti-semitism" side of the Dual Persecution Strategy keeps the US Congress in line:
"I can tell you from personal experience that, at least in the Congress, the support Israel has in that body is based completely on political fear--fear of defeat by anyone who does not do what Israel wants done. I can also tell you that very few members of Congress--at least when I served there--have any affection for Israel or for its Lobby. What they have is contempt, but it is silenced by fear of being found out exactly how they feel. I've heard too many cloakroom conversations in which members of the Senate will voice their bitter feelings about how they're pushed around by the Lobby to think otherwise. In private one hears the dislike of Israel and the tactics of the Lobby, but not one of them is willing to risk the Lobby's animosity by making their feelings public."
("Former Senator James Abourezk on Chomsky and the Israel Lobby in the US", Al-Jazeerah, December 5, 2006.)
James Abourzek also makes clear that the "anti-semitism" side of the Dual Persecution Strategy is what holds those elements of the media not controlled through ownership or staffing in check:
"Secondly, the Lobby is quite clear in its efforts to suppress any congressional dissent from the policy of complete support for Israel which might hurt annual appropriations. Even one voice is attacked, as I was, on grounds that if Congress is completely silent on the issue, the press will have no one to quote, which effectively silences the press as well. Any journalists or editors who step out of line are quickly brought under control by well organized economic pressure against the newspaper caught sinning."
("Former Senator James Abourezk on Chomsky and the Israel Lobby in the US", Al-Jazeerah, December 5, 2006.)
If you buy into "racism" or "anti-semitism" word games, you're consenting to the Dual Persecution Strategy. In doing so, you're supporting the Jewish lobby's coordinated intimidation of politicians and media and therefore, by extension, you're supporting the Jewish lobby's agenda. This includes advancing Zionism, racial engineering and censorship.
COLLABORATORS AND USEFUL IDIOTS
Collaborators typically get a pay off for selling out. In apartheid South Africa, blacks who were against black group interests and favored white group interests (uncle Toms) were allowed into the black elite. In Judeo-America, whites who are against white group interests and favor minority group interests (collaborators) get to stay in the white elite. White elites who violate this adapted "Code of the Uncle Tom" are chased out by the Dual Persecution Strategy.
Immigration is an issue that illustrates these contrasting white and minority group interests and the anomalous behavior of white elites. Majority opinion has been against immigration, legal or illegal, since polling began. (http://www.numbersusa.com/interests/publicoparchive.html ). Yet, decade after decade, immigration continues. What is blocking the democratic process?
A recent opinion poll shows that while almost 80% of the public is against mass immigration and 60% consider it a critical threat, only 14% of the opinion elite (members of Congress, the administration, leaders of church groups, business executives, union leaders, journalists, academics, and heads of major interest groups) share the public's concern. (http://www.vdare.com/roberts/immigrationdictatorship.htm ).
Although collaborators are a minority, they are part of the elite. As opinion polls show, they are not powerful enough to convince the majority that racial engineering (immigration, diversity and multiculturalism) is good. But, being part of the elite, they are powerful enough to block the democratic process and force racial engineering on the public against its will.
Although collaborators agree that an African who wants to become a minority in his own country is either an "uncle Tom" or clinically insane, they themselves are not insane and do not consider themselves such. The vast majority collaborates out of fear of the Dual Persecution Strategy or out of career opportunism, not because they actually believe in Zionism, racial engineering or censorship.
In summary, if you buy into "racism" or "anti-semitism" word games, you're supporting Zionism, racial engineering and censorship. If you're white and not part of the opinion elite, you're collaborating for nothing.
A useful idiot is someone who sells out for free.
Steven Palese. Public domain. Distribute freely.
---------------------
Anyway, thanks for the find and keep fighting :)
stevenp
Post a Comment
<< Home