Race, immigration and the British election
Alice Miles on the immigration problem facing Tony Blair:
Race is the great, silent issue in this election. It is driving everything. Out there in the real world, away from Westminster, Notting Hill and the broadcasting studios, the electorate in the marginal seats over which the parties are now fighting is obsessed with immigration. These voters seethe over confused groups of immigrants, asylum-seekers and gypsy travellers who appear to them to get away with breaking all the rules and living off everybody else. They don’t pay taxes, they claim benefits, they use the NHS and they get “our” houses. And they seem to be beyond the law.
This concern crosses over into anger about low-level crime and antisocial behaviour. It poisons perceptions of the public services, seen to be wasting money on undeserving recipients. And, however well people do, they feel personally hard done by because look at all these other people getting everything for nothing.
I don’t know why this is. But I know that it is happening. MPs are tearing their hair out about it. Focus groups are blinded by it. Michael Howard plays on it. Ministers criticise the Government for having failed to tackle it. Yet Mr Blair seems unable or unwilling to address it. He has neither met the concerns of voters, nor explained to them strongly enough why he thinks them wrong.
And until he does, the voters will continue not to hear what he is saying. The next few weeks will see the Prime Minister traipse around marginal seats trying to persuade people that Labour is listening to them. And he won’t hear them and they won’t hear him because they are speaking different languages. He can take all his clothes off and scream naked about his record and all these voters will notice is the East European in the crowd. Immigration and asylum is the only issue among the dozen or so most important in determining how people vote in which the Tories have a lead over Labour. Read that again. The only issue. In every single other area, from the economy to health, education, pensions, taxes, and even Europe and Iraq, Labour is in the lead. Yet the parties are within a couple of points of one another in the polls.
Like it or not, this is the issue quietly dominating this election. Labour has failed to confront it in two terms in office, and an election campaign is no time to start. All Mr Blair can do is try to neutralise it by accusing Mr Howard or the Tories of opportunism or even racism. Sometimes you have to get negative, and issues do not come much more negative than the desire, reasonable or otherwise, to strip benefits and the very homes from others. If he can protect his nether regions until then, this will be Mr Blair’s big challenge in his third term.
Cutting down on the number of people who are allowed to emigrate to Britain and reducing their taxpayer-funded benefits would probably help Blair a lot with the British voters. The question is does Blair have the backbone to do so in spite of the inevitable attacks from the politically-correct media?
3 Comments:
"I don’t know why this is."
?
"Michael Howard plays on it."
Yes, well, maybe I'm making too much of the phrase "plays on it", but I do get a whiff of something here, as if she wants to hint that Howard is taking unfair political advantage of these feelings in a demagogic kind of way, i.e. 'playing the race card'.
Doing as you suggest may indeed help Blair; but he probably doesn't have the "backbone". Either that, or he really believes the usual politically correct pablum about all of the above.
But I'm wondering: Why didn't you suggest pushing this issue a little harder would help Howard and the Tories? After all, there is in general not a huge amount of "backbone" detectable in the public positions of both parties about this, and since the Tories are out of power, and this sort of line would seem to suit them better, perhaps it would be of even more benefit to them on election day.
If the Tories concentrate too much on one issue it looks like they have no other ideas. Blair is beating the Tories on most issues but is doing badly on the issue of immigration. Therefore it is Blair who stands to benefit most by taking a harsher line on immigration.
Sorry, Adam, that is a little too mechanical. Blair's principle difficulty with the electorate is trust. He cannot get meaningfully tough on immigration because the voters - or, at least, the white ones who live or work in English cities - have seen what Labour actually does in office. Their view of Blair has developed uncomfortably close to cynicism.
Furthermore, Blair must curry favour with the minorities - he needs their votes. But he does it from an ideological standpoint, too. He is a transnationalist and a blank-slater, and has hugely speeded up the racial replacement of the English working-class. Thus, his interest in Middle England is a pure fiction, peddled for electoral purposes only. When he talks about asylum seekers it is only because he wants to contest an otherwise Tory constituency.
Post a Comment
<< Home