Wednesday, February 14, 2007

The NAACP and the Duke rape hoax

William L. Anderson:

One of the central issues in the Duke Non-Rape, Non-Kidnapping, and Non-Sexual Assault case has been the absence of what some might call "evidence" that demonstrates even minimal contact between the accuser, Crystal Gail Mangum, and the three former Duke student athletes, Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty, and David Evans. While the State of North Carolina still insists that these three young men beat and sexually assaulted Mangum, many of us are arguing that evidence should matter. Enablers of the state, however, declare that evidence matters only when they want it to matter.

One of the loudest voices demanding that the three young men go to trial has been the North Carolina NAACP. In an earlier article, I likened what the NAACP has done in this case to what occurred during the Jim Crow era. I had hoped that in the four months since I wrote those words, the North Carolina NAACP would be willing to look at the exculpatory evidence and see that this case truly is a hoax.

Instead, the NAACP has become even more shrill in its rhetoric. For example, even though the first Duke prosecutor Michael B. Nifong dropped rape charges, the NAACP in its website still insists that the three young men raped Crystal Gail Mangum. (In fact, the NAACP gives a timeline that conflicts with the latest timeline that Nifong received from Mangum in a December 21 interview, but the NAACP insists that both its story and Mangum’s story, though mutually exclusive, are equally true.)

“Hate Crimes”?—Or “Hoax Crimes”?

A class action

Nifong foe challenges judge about delay of case

Another Duke Rape!

Duke Rape Deux


At 7:08 AM, Anonymous Nick Kasoff said...

This case is starting to sound a lot like Tawana Brawley. Maybe we'll get lucky, from an entertainment point of view, and Al Sharpton will jump into the mix.

Nick Kasoff
Thug Report


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

View My Stats