Thursday, June 15, 2006

In the early days of the Duke lacrosse rape case, Mike Nifong’s public statements appear to have contradicted certain facts in his own files

Joseph Neff:

After an escort service dancer said three men raped her at a lacrosse party, Nifong talked frequently with national and local reporters – 50 to 70 interviews consuming 40 hours of his time, Nifong estimated.

Nifong then went quiet in early April, refusing most interview requests.

A comparison of his words with documents that Nifong gave defense lawyers show that Nifong made what appear to be misstatements about condom use, a purported struggle and a 911 call made by a second dancer, among other things.

Nifong said the assailants might have used condoms; the accuser told an emergency-room nurse none were used, according to a defense filing.

Nifong described a violent attack in which the accuser was choked and struggled to breathe; the accuser told a nurse she wasn’t choked, the filing said.

Defense lawyers have filed some of the documents in court and characterized others, such as the medical exam, in affidavits.

Nifong declined through an assistant to answer questions Wednesday.

Either he knew what the facts were and misstated them, or he was making them up,” said James Coleman, a Duke law professor who has publicly requested that Nifong remove himself from the case.

“Whether he acted knowing they were false, or if he was reckless, it doesn’t matter in the long run. This is the kind of stuff that causes the public to lose confidence in the justice system.”

North Carolina lawyers must obey the N.C. State Bar’s Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibit lawyers from making out-of-court statements that could prejudice the outcome of a case.

Prosecutors have added responsibilities: The rules prohibit them from saying things outside court that could heighten public condemnation of the accused.

Nifong has called lacrosse players “hooligans” and “reprehensible.”

Defense lawyers for Reade Seligmann have cited these comments and the bar’s rules in asking that Nifong be removed from the case, a request pending before a Durham Superior Court judge.

Duke Lacrosse: Assessing the News & Observer

Drop the Duke Rape Case


At 8:55 PM, Anonymous Bety Friedan said...

With each passing day it seems that we find out that Nifong lied about many tings. The one that pisses me ff the most is that he said a date rape drug was used when he was the only one in possession of all the evidence showing that no rape date test was ever done.

At 2:07 PM, Blogger Adam Lawson said...

The fact that things are going so badly for Nifong right now helps to restore my faith in the criminal justice system.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

View My Stats